Weekly pattern, eight months
match flagged ← All logistic growth benchmarks256 daily rows approaching the ceiling, with 64 days of forecast.
Input
benchmark/inputs/v1/logistic-implicit-floor-large.json: 256 history rows and 64 forecast rows.
Output
Largest difference: 2.3e-5 (< 0.0001% of the input's range).
Every forecast row from both libraries.
| Date | Effect Prophet | Python Prophet | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-13 | 90.5159 | 90.5159 | 1.9e-6 |
| 2020-09-14 | 90.4227 | 90.4227 | 2.3e-5 |
| 2020-09-15 | 90.6228 | 90.6228 | 1.8e-5 |
| 2020-09-16 | 91.0502 | 91.0502 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-09-17 | 91.5247 | 91.5248 | 1.5e-5 |
| 2020-09-18 | 91.7626 | 91.7626 | 7.1e-6 |
| 2020-09-19 | 91.6316 | 91.6316 | 1.7e-7 |
| 2020-09-20 | 91.3572 | 91.3572 | 2.5e-6 |
| 2020-09-21 | 91.2640 | 91.2640 | 2.3e-5 |
| 2020-09-22 | 91.4640 | 91.4640 | 1.8e-5 |
| 2020-09-23 | 91.8913 | 91.8914 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-09-24 | 92.3658 | 92.3659 | 1.6e-5 |
| 2020-09-25 | 92.6036 | 92.6036 | 6.7e-6 |
| 2020-09-26 | 92.4726 | 92.4726 | 6.1e-7 |
| 2020-09-27 | 92.1982 | 92.1982 | 2.9e-6 |
| 2020-09-28 | 92.1049 | 92.1049 | 2.2e-5 |
| 2020-09-29 | 92.3049 | 92.3048 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-09-30 | 92.7322 | 92.7322 | 1.8e-5 |
| 2020-10-01 | 93.2066 | 93.2067 | 1.6e-5 |
| 2020-10-02 | 93.4444 | 93.4444 | 6.3e-6 |
| 2020-10-03 | 93.3133 | 93.3133 | 9.4e-7 |
| 2020-10-04 | 93.0389 | 93.0389 | 3.2e-6 |
| 2020-10-05 | 92.9456 | 92.9455 | 2.2e-5 |
| 2020-10-06 | 93.1455 | 93.1455 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-10-07 | 93.5728 | 93.5728 | 1.8e-5 |
| 2020-10-08 | 94.0472 | 94.0472 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-10-09 | 94.2850 | 94.2849 | 6.1e-6 |
| 2020-10-10 | 94.1538 | 94.1538 | 1.2e-6 |
| 2020-10-11 | 93.8794 | 93.8794 | 3.5e-6 |
| 2020-10-12 | 93.7861 | 93.7860 | 2.2e-5 |
| 2020-10-13 | 93.9860 | 93.9859 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-10-14 | 94.4132 | 94.4132 | 1.8e-5 |
| 2020-10-15 | 94.8876 | 94.8877 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-10-16 | 95.1254 | 95.1253 | 5.9e-6 |
| 2020-10-17 | 94.9942 | 94.9942 | 1.4e-6 |
| 2020-10-18 | 94.7197 | 94.7197 | 3.6e-6 |
| 2020-10-19 | 94.6264 | 94.6264 | 2.2e-5 |
| 2020-10-20 | 94.8263 | 94.8263 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-10-21 | 95.2535 | 95.2536 | 1.8e-5 |
| 2020-10-22 | 95.7279 | 95.7280 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-10-23 | 95.9656 | 95.9656 | 5.7e-6 |
| 2020-10-24 | 95.8345 | 95.8345 | 1.5e-6 |
| 2020-10-25 | 95.5600 | 95.5600 | 3.8e-6 |
| 2020-10-26 | 95.4667 | 95.4666 | 2.1e-5 |
| 2020-10-27 | 95.6665 | 95.6665 | 1.6e-5 |
| 2020-10-28 | 96.0938 | 96.0938 | 1.9e-5 |
| 2020-10-29 | 96.5682 | 96.5682 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-10-30 | 96.8059 | 96.8059 | 5.6e-6 |
| 2020-10-31 | 96.6747 | 96.6747 | 1.6e-6 |
| 2020-11-01 | 96.4002 | 96.4002 | 3.9e-6 |
| 2020-11-02 | 96.3068 | 96.3068 | 2.1e-5 |
| 2020-11-03 | 96.5067 | 96.5067 | 1.6e-5 |
| 2020-11-04 | 96.9339 | 96.9340 | 1.9e-5 |
| 2020-11-05 | 97.4083 | 97.4083 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-11-06 | 97.6460 | 97.6460 | 5.5e-6 |
| 2020-11-07 | 97.5148 | 97.5148 | 1.7e-6 |
| 2020-11-08 | 97.2403 | 97.2403 | 3.9e-6 |
| 2020-11-09 | 97.1470 | 97.1470 | 2.1e-5 |
| 2020-11-10 | 97.3468 | 97.3468 | 1.6e-5 |
| 2020-11-11 | 97.7741 | 97.7741 | 1.9e-5 |
| 2020-11-12 | 98.2484 | 98.2485 | 1.7e-5 |
| 2020-11-13 | 98.4861 | 98.4861 | 5.5e-6 |
| 2020-11-14 | 98.3549 | 98.3549 | 1.8e-6 |
| 2020-11-15 | 98.0804 | 98.0804 | 4.0e-6 |
Internal fit differences
The forecasts match, so this case passes. Both libraries search for the best-fitting parameters and stop when they are close enough. On this input they stopped at slightly different points, so these internal numbers differ by more than the threshold where we take a closer look.
| Check | Effect Prophet | Python Prophet | Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stationarity residual (lower is closer to the best fit) | 108.1047 | 4.4441 | 0.01 |
Timing
Median of all measured repetitions.
| Step | Effect Prophet | Python Prophet | Effect Prophet is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Convert input rows | 53 µs | 577 µs | 11× faster |
| Fit | 4.81 ms | 9.51 ms | 2.0× faster |
| Predict | 399 µs | 3.21 ms | 8.1× faster |
| Fit and predict | 4.32 ms | 12.9 ms | 3.0× faster |
| Convert, fit and predict | 4.04 ms | 13.3 ms | 3.3× faster |
| First forecast in a new process | 179 ms | 1.41 s | 7.9× faster |
| Save model to JSON | 34 µs | 643 µs | 19× faster |
| Load model from JSON | 107 µs | 2.58 ms | 24× faster |
| Load and predict in a new process | 192 ms | 1.40 s | 7.3× faster |
Settings
The case declaration both libraries ran.
json
{
"kind": "map",
"comparison": {
"kind": "equivalent-objective",
"evidenceId": "logistic-map-v1"
},
"configuration": {
"growth": "logistic",
"scaling": "minmax",
"seasonalityMode": "additive",
"holidaysMode": "additive",
"changepoints": {
"mode": "explicit",
"timestamps": [
"2020-02-10T00:00:00.000Z"
]
},
"changepointPriorScale": 0.2,
"seasonalities": [
{
"name": "weekly-custom",
"periodDays": 7,
"fourierOrder": 2,
"priorScale": 10
}
],
"events": [],
"regressors": []
},
"pythonOptimizer": {
"algorithm": "Auto",
"maxIterations": 10000,
"newtonFallback": true,
"sigFigs": 12
}
}