Samples for one future date
match ← All linear growth benchmarks128 raw simulated values for a single date after the history.
Input
benchmark/inputs/v1/linear-offset-scaling.json: 96 history rows and 24 forecast rows.
Output
Largest difference: 1.2e-11 (< 0.0001% of the input's range).
Every forecast row from both libraries.
| Date | Effect Prophet | Python Prophet | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-06 | 110.0819 | 110.0819 | 1.2e-11 |
Timing
Median of all measured repetitions.
| Step | Effect Prophet | Python Prophet | Effect Prophet is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Convert input rows | 16 µs | 486 µs | 31× faster |
| Save model to JSON | 28 µs | 459 µs | 16× faster |
| Load model from JSON | 179 µs | 2.19 ms | 12× faster |
| Simulate uncertainty | 204 µs | 16.8 ms | Not compared: different work |
| First simulation in a new process | 175 ms | 1.50 s | Not compared: different work |
| Load and simulate in a new process | 163 ms | 1.45 s | Not compared: different work |
Some steps aren't compared, because the two libraries' public calls produce different outputs. Their times show what each call costs, not which library is faster.
- Simulate uncertainty, First simulation in a new process, Load and simulate in a new process: Python's
predictive_samples(vectorized=False)and Effect Prophet'spredictUncertaintyare different public calls: Python's timing includes resetting NumPy's random generator and returns NumPy matrices, and the two don't draw the same random numbers.
Settings
The case declaration both libraries ran.
json
{
"kind": "map",
"comparison": {
"kind": "equivalent-objective",
"evidenceId": "linear-output-first-v4"
},
"configuration": {
"growth": "linear",
"scaling": "absmax",
"seasonalityMode": "additive",
"holidaysMode": "additive",
"changepoints": {
"mode": "explicit",
"timestamps": [
"2020-02-10T00:00:00.000Z"
]
},
"changepointPriorScale": 0.2,
"seasonalities": [
{
"name": "weekly-custom",
"periodDays": 7,
"fourierOrder": 2,
"priorScale": 10
}
],
"events": [],
"regressors": []
},
"effectOptimizer": {
"algorithm": "auto",
"maxIterations": 10000,
"fallback": "newton",
"lbfgs": {
"historySize": 5,
"initAlpha": 0.001,
"tolObj": 1e-12,
"tolRelObj": 10000,
"tolGrad": 1e-8,
"tolRelGrad": 10000000,
"tolParam": 1e-8
}
},
"pythonOptimizer": {
"algorithm": "Auto",
"maxIterations": 10000,
"newtonFallback": true,
"sigFigs": 12
},
"uncertainty": {
"seed": 19,
"samples": 128,
"intervalWidth": 0.8,
"output": "samples",
"algorithm": "scalar-continuous-time",
"evidence": "docs/validation/uncertainty.md#evidence-classes",
"samplerMemoryLimitBytes": 67108864
}
}