Choosing settings by a custom metric
match ← All linear growth benchmarksTwo candidate settings ranked by a custom WAPE metric, next to the same search by MAE.
Input
benchmark/inputs/v1/linear-offset-scaling.json: 96 history rows and 24 forecast rows.
Output
Largest difference: 2.9e-11 (< 0.0001% of the input's range).
Each row is one forecast made during cross-validation, next to the value that actually happened.
| Date | Actual | Effect Prophet | Python Prophet | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-11 | 107.2568 | 107.1688 | 107.1688 | 2.9e-11 |
| 2020-03-12 | 107.4776 | 107.4962 | 107.4962 | 2.9e-11 |
| 2020-03-13 | 107.6213 | 107.7018 | 107.7018 | 2.8e-11 |
| 2020-03-14 | 107.7396 | 107.6554 | 107.6554 | 2.8e-11 |
| 2020-03-15 | 107.6534 | 107.5295 | 107.5295 | 2.7e-11 |
| 2020-03-16 | 107.5228 | 107.5532 | 107.5532 | 2.8e-11 |
| 2020-03-17 | 107.7277 | 107.7317 | 107.7317 | 2.8e-11 |
| 2020-03-18 | 108.1448 | 108.0262 | 108.0262 | 1.8e-11 |
| 2020-03-19 | 108.3767 | 108.3442 | 108.3442 | 1.8e-11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 108.4456 | 108.5444 | 108.5444 | 1.8e-11 |
| 2020-03-21 | 108.5155 | 108.5134 | 108.5134 | 1.7e-11 |
| 2020-03-22 | 108.4600 | 108.3912 | 108.3912 | 1.7e-11 |
| 2020-03-23 | 108.3204 | 108.4014 | 108.4014 | 1.8e-11 |
| 2020-03-24 | 108.4700 | 108.5823 | 108.5823 | 1.8e-11 |
Timing
Median of all measured repetitions.
| Step | Effect Prophet | Python Prophet | Effect Prophet is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Search settings | 20.4 ms | 143 ms | Not compared: different work |
| Search settings by a custom metric | 17.7 ms | 151 ms | Not compared: different work |
Some steps aren't compared, because the two libraries' public calls produce different outputs. Their times show what each call costs, not which library is faster.
- Search settings, Search settings by a custom metric: Python Prophet's cross-validation returns different outputs, and baselines, search and holdout reports have no Python API, so the benchmark times equivalent application code. The two libraries also compute ranges and some metrics differently.
Settings
The case declaration both libraries ran.
json
{
"kind": "evaluation",
"comparison": {
"kind": "different-public-work",
"evidenceId": "rolling-origin-evaluation-v1"
},
"configuration": {
"growth": "linear",
"scaling": "absmax",
"seasonalityMode": "additive",
"holidaysMode": "additive",
"changepoints": {
"mode": "explicit",
"timestamps": [
"2020-02-10T00:00:00.000Z"
]
},
"changepointPriorScale": 0.2,
"seasonalities": [
{
"name": "weekly-custom",
"periodDays": 7,
"fourierOrder": 2,
"priorScale": 10
}
],
"events": [],
"regressors": []
},
"effectOptimizer": {
"algorithm": "auto",
"maxIterations": 10000,
"fallback": "newton",
"lbfgs": {
"historySize": 5,
"initAlpha": 0.001,
"tolObj": 1e-12,
"tolRelObj": 10000,
"tolGrad": 1e-8,
"tolRelGrad": 10000000,
"tolParam": 1e-8
}
},
"pythonOptimizer": {
"algorithm": "Auto",
"maxIterations": 10000,
"newtonFallback": true,
"sigFigs": 12
},
"plan": {
"horizonMs": 604800000,
"cutoffs": [
"2020-03-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"2020-03-17T00:00:00.000Z"
]
},
"metricAggregation": "overall",
"candidates": [
{
"id": "prior-low",
"changepointPriorScale": 0.05
},
{
"id": "prior-high",
"changepointPriorScale": 0.2
}
]
}